Zane Johnson

I build AI systems that turn messy data into decisions.

Computer Science @ Notre Dame ’29 · this is my room in St. Edward's Hall

Skip to projects ↓

About — Zane Johnson

Zane Johnson

I build AI systems that turn messy data into decisions.

Computer Science @ Notre Dame ’29 · from Atlanta, GA

I’m a CS sophomore at Notre Dame who ships working software end to end: ingestion pipelines and schemas, the agents and tools on top, and the product people actually use. I build with AI coding agents and own the architecture, the decisions (every project keeps ADRs) and the tests.

Résumé PDFGitHub ↗LinkedIn ↗zjohnso4@nd.edu

Capabilities — backed by projects

↗
See the full matrix with proof →

Encore

Beta

Live-music app

A live-music app where an AI pipeline reads venue websites every day and decides which shows are reliable enough to publish.

221 venues · 2 cities

Atlanta and South Bend venues, pre-launch beta

  • 44 Postgres migrations
  • 32 tables, all with row-level security
  • 4 scheduled jobs (ingest, digests, reminders)
Open Encore →

Vesper

Daily use

Personal AI assistant

An always-on AI assistant that knows my notes, deadlines and inbox, works from every device I own, and logs every action it takes.

23,744 events

logged by daily use since Sep 2, 2026

  • 39 MCP tools
  • 321 automated tests
  • 46 architecture decision records
Open Vesper →

OfferDesk

Public repo

Internship tracker

An internship tracker that tells you who to follow up with today — and that an AI assistant can update for you over MCP.

18 MCP tools

so an AI assistant can run the tracker for you

  • 123 test cases
  • 43 REST API routes
  • 7 architecture decision records
Open OfferDesk →

alphalab

Building

Strategy research lab

A research lab that tests AI-written trading strategies honestly, so a lucky backtest can't pass as skill.

16 of 16 lucky strategies rejected

pre-registered, graded only on data they never saw

  • 518 test cases
  • 11 point-in-time data feeds
  • 21 indicators, each with a no-look-ahead test
Open alphalab →

Nudge study

Building

Data analysis

An analysis of 343 hand-judged nudges from my AI assistant that found repetition, not model confidence, separates useful from noise.

15% vs 58% useful

a rule's 11th+ firing vs. its 2nd–3rd, across 343 judged nudges

  • 1,725 nudges raised by Vesper's intuition engine
  • 343 judged by hand: useful, wrong or noise
  • 0.57 → 0.69 held-out AUC: model confidence alone vs. a logistic model
Open Nudge study →

Also built